Talk:Geology Hall, New Brunswick, New Jersey

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Geology Hall)
Former featured articleGeology Hall, New Brunswick, New Jersey is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Good articleGeology Hall, New Brunswick, New Jersey has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 2, 2013Good article nomineeListed
April 14, 2014Featured article candidatePromoted
July 16, 2022Featured article reviewDemoted
August 13, 2022Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on October 6, 2013.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the museum in Geology Hall at Rutgers University displays a Ptolemaic-era female Egyptian mummy?
Current status: Former featured article, current good article

TFAR[edit]

Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/Geology Hall 2 --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:07, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Geology Hall
The skeleton of a mastodon discovered in Salem County in 1869
Map
Established1872 (1872)
LocationQueens Campus section of Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States
Coordinates40°29′55″N 74°26′47″E / 40.498588°N 74.446504°E / 40.498588; 74.446504
Websitegeologymuseum.rutgers.edu
Built1872
ArchitectHenry Janeway Hardenbergh
Added to NRHP1973

I could imagine an infobox, for example, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:41, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Geology Hall. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:59, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Geology Hall. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:36, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FAR needed[edit]

Original FA nominator is a serial hoaxer/reference faker, see Wikipedia:Featured article review/Lieutenant Governor of New Jersey/archive1 and User_talk:Hog_Farm/Archive_10#Neglected_but_important_cleanup. Failed verification issues noted just from a brief look today. This needs FAR'd ASAP. Hog Farm Talk 18:26, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Geology Hall, New Brunswick, New Jersey/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Premeditated Chaos (talk · contribs) 01:23, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Looks neat. I'll review. ♠PMC(talk) 01:23, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lead
  • "The museum was established in the same year" - not a big deal but as the previous sentence gives two years, this could be seen as ambiguous
  • I think the lead needs to be expanded to cover more of the article's scope
  • Speaking of scope, since the article discusses the Rutgers Geology Museum as well as the building, the museum should be bolded in the lead and perhaps emphasized slightly more
History
  • Not sure para 1 needs to lead with the 1872 founding, it feels a bit confusing to be told one date and then go immediately back to the 1830s.
  • Can we get slight context for Lewis Caleb Beck? (Even just a single word "geologist Lewis Caleb Beck" is fine)
    • Job desc. added. Dude was something of a scientific polymath as I understand. –♠Vamí_IV†♠ 19:13, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Para 3 sentence 1 feels like it's reading out of order, going from Henry to Jacob back to Henry - it would be tidier to put the clause about "the architect selected" first, I think, then you're going from Henry to Jacob cleanly.
  • Context for Albert Huntington Chester?
Architecture
  • Section feels kind of skimpy compared to the fairly robust history section
    • What is there is honestly all I could find on my own with the resources known to me. I have some contact information for relevant members of the Rutgers faculty, though, and I could inquire for more from them. –♠Vamí_IV†♠ 19:13, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Nah, it is what it is. We are only so good as the sources we have and it's certainly not enough to fail GA on. ♠PMC(talk) 23:36, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I see why it's here given that it's transitioning off the mention of the armory, but theft of muskets feels like it belongs in the history section
    For the life of me I could not find a way to include this in #History. –♠Vamí_IV†♠ 19:13, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Thoughts about the section swap mentioned below? ♠PMC(talk) 23:37, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Swapped and required adjustments made. –♠Vamí_IV†♠ 03:13, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I wonder if Architecture should be moved up ahead of History, which would allow the armory to be mentioned in History without surprising the user
Everything else

Overall it's a well-written article that just needs some tweaks. Feel free to discuss if you don't agree with suggested changes. No concerns about sourcing reliability/source-text integrity. ♠PMC(talk) 15:52, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Basically almost there. Slight expansion to the lead, response to the section swap suggestion, and we're good to go. ♠PMC(talk) 23:38, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
How's it look now? –♠Vamí_IV†♠ 03:13, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Good to go my friend! Congrats on another GA :) ♠PMC(talk) 06:04, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]